has anyone ever thought what people mean when they say i did it in the name of God. similar when they commit acts of terrorisum and/or genocide in the name of God.
to me it is simple to exsplaine, it is people taking the onus off them and saying it was all to some grand plan. well this is where i have problems with this way of thinking.
first of all tocommit an act like genocide then say it was in the name of God is one placing the blame onto someone else, second how can you say it is the will of a God or gods.
i will try to exsplain through the collapse of the classical world and the rise of the dark ages. most people don’t know that this is the time when one of the biggest genocides happened, some people call it the pagan genocide. mainly what happend Empaor constaine and his successors used the new religion of christianity to ciment his power over the roman Empire. in doing so what he did was put to death all the people that did not agree with him or he sore as a threat. he did this by changeing the religion he adopted and then used that to put to death the rest of the pagan world if they did not convert. this went on for over 200 years and was the cores of the collapse of human knowledge and plunged the world into a darkage that only untill the start of restoration period.
here you can see what happens use this idea In the name of God. it is a great way to give any cores even if you perpetuate the most hainus act you can take all guilt away from you as it was Gods will.
this is where people take away all responsibility from them and to anther. then also say that their god is a just and loving god, after committing a terroist act or genocide like the examplei gave above. these people commit a logical phallusy, they say god is compassionate and at the same time vengeful as well as been infallible. you can see where the conflict is here, but this just show that their arugument and acts where not the will of some God but their own act.
if you blive in god anc he is infallible and you believe he tries to to good and encourage peopel to do good, then he can’t do evil as that then conflicts the idea that he is infallible.
and this is where i hate it when people say it is gods will or it was done in the name of god. i think that these people should just admit they do evil things because it was their will.
the police and social workers in Aberdeen are a complete waste of space. this is the new one I have heard they have said now, that you can not punish a child even by shouting at them or standing them in a corner. and don’t ground them and say they aren’t allowed out to go off and smoke and take drugs you are supposed to let them do what they won’t.
and they wonder why half of the children are not going to school and stealing it is a joke. I can point you to quite a few laws that say different but they seem to think as they are police they can make up any law they won’t.
this is the sort of thing that is perpetuating the crime problems it is like the police are manipulating children into committing crimes so they something to do. this reminds me of the stories in the history books about when the Greeks and the roman fire brigades would start fires, then only putting them out after money changed hands. i am not saying this is about bribes but what i am saying it is plane to see that this is about the police allowing children to run around like they own the place.
this to me sounds like individuals in the Aberdeen police and social work department think they can make up the law as they go along. if anyone else was to do that they would be arrested. it is clear to see the Aberdeen police force has just become another street gang not caring about true law and order.
this can also be seen over what has transpired over at an estate nere Aberdeen where people have been harassed by certain individuals that are building a golf cores for rich weirdos. one incident i can highlight is the man handling of a reporter for filming and interviewing people. another it the blatant disregard for people around there. mainly what i am getting at is the police have been aloud to get away with anything they won’t, and now they seem to be aloud to implement anything that they deem to be the law. i don’t know but when did Judge Dredd take over the policing of Aberdeen.
First of all I am not saying that I think Wikipedia is a bad thing the concept of a free encyclopaedia which people can access is a noble idea. The free flow of human knowledge is a truly noble idea. But in the same way that Wikipedia is free knowledge it is also free to change and edit how people see fit. Sometimes this is to correct a mistake and other times it is to mislead the reader.
in the same way you can have incorrect information in a published book this is why if you wish to find out about any subject you need to go to multiple sources and compere what you are reading or seeing. If your where to put on a dissertation that the whole of your evidence came from Wikipedia then I don’t think you would get a good mark.
Like any form of knowledge it is written down by people and has quite a lot of the personality of the person that wrote it. this is when we need to find people who are qualified in their field and not off Mr smith down the road who herd something off a guy in the public bar who herd it off a friend.
another thing that is a problem is when people use quote from Wikipedia without understanding the meaning or context it is written in. this to me is just as bad as the person who does quote mining to win an argument. This has also spores a load of people who say they know fictitious people who said this and they just copied and pasted it form our old friend the internet.
What I am trying to say here we should be very careful about where we get information from or it can colour our idea of what is true fact and what is fiction
Welcome to WordPress.com! This is your very first post. Click the Edit link to modify or delete it, or start a new post. If you like, use this post to tell readers why you started this blog and what you plan to do with it.